Republican Senator Roger Wicker has taken heat online after he took credit for championing direct aid to the restaurant industry. The problem is, the assistance is included in a $1.9 trillion Covid-19 package that he opposed.
Wicker has been accused of trying to score political points on the back of the mammoth Covid-19 relief package passed by Congress on Wednesday after a drawn-out debate. The House voted predominantly along party lines, with Democratic Representative Jared Golden of Maine siding with all 210 Republicans to oppose the bill.
Shortly after the legislation was approved, Wicker extolled the virtues of a portion of the bill funneling $28.6 billion in direct aid to restaurants.
“The funding will ensure small businesses can survive the pandemic by helping to adapt their operation and keep their employees on the payroll,” he tweeted.
Independent restaurant operators have won $28.6 billion worth of targeted relief.This funding will ensure small businesses can survive the pandemic by helping to adapt their operations and keep their employees on the payroll.https://t.co/Ob4pRb9Xh4
— Senator Roger Wicker (@SenatorWicker) March 10, 2021
The tweet drew mockery from supporters of the Democratic Party, who said Wicker can’t have it both ways, since he actually voted against the bill.
“And you voted against it. Shame on you,” actor Mark Ruffalo said.
And you voted against it. Shame on you.
— Mark Ruffalo (@MarkRuffalo) March 11, 2021
“How freaking stupid do you think your constituents are, Senator Wicker?” Washington Post columnist Helaine Olen tweeted.
How freaking stupid do you think your constituents are, Senator Wicker?
— Helaine Olen (@helaineolen) March 11, 2021
Facing backlash on Twitter, Wicker rejected the criticism, telling CNN correspondent Manu Raju that he has long supported the issue of aid to restaurants and that its inclusion in the bill is no more than a silver lining.
“Just because there’s one good provision in a $1.9 trillion bill, doesn’t mean I have to vote for it… I think it’s a stupid question. I’m not going to vote for $1.9 trillion just because it has a couple of good provisions in it,” Wicker reportedly told Raju.
“I think it’s an entirely consistent position,” he added.
Despite courting controversy, the senator’s stance seemingly hit home. Wicker received a thumbs-up from the Independent Restaurant Coalition, a trade group created with the stated goal of saving restaurants affected by the pandemic from going out of business.
“You are right, Senator Wicker did not vote for the package (we wish all members did!), but his work on the RESTAURANTS Act from the beginning made the relief fund possible. We are grateful for that work,” the group said, responding to the torrent of outrage directed at the lawmaker.
We appreciate the comments here. You are right, Senator Wicker did not vote for the package (we wish all members did!), but his work on the RESTAURANTS Act from the beginning made the relief fund possible. We are grateful for that work.
— Independent Restaurant Coalition (@IndpRestaurants) March 11, 2021
The stimulus bill includes a one-time direct payment of $1,400 to millions of Americans. Of the total amount, $400 billion is earmarked for those payments, and another $350 billion is envisaged as assistance to state and local governments. Republicans argued that the package was blown out of proportion to include funding for the Democratic Party’s increasingly progressive agenda, such as boosting Obamacare subsidies and “environmental justice” grants.
House Republican leader Kevin McCarthy called the package “a laundry list of leftwing priorities that predate the pandemic and do not meet the needs of American families.”
Let’s be clear → This isn’t a rescue bill. It’s a laundry list of leftwing priorities that predate the pandemic and do not meet the needs of American families. https://t.co/Hmjmc7Oesk
— Kevin McCarthy (@GOPLeader) March 10, 2021
Think your friends would be interested? Share this story!